spaceballl
Jun 15, 09:50 AM
Well, I live in CA, but I'm going to be in NY next week for business so I'm actually having it shipped to the NY hotel...
rprebel
Oct 29, 12:54 PM
http://guides.macrumors.com/Help:MacRumors_FAQ#How_do_user_titles_work.3F
Doc750
Feb 11, 09:18 AM
How do you know you will lose the rollover mins? Does it state this?
yes ...
yes ...
pleasehelp!
Apr 12, 08:04 PM
figured it out. it is the last one.
more...
ChrisA
Apr 6, 02:03 PM
12 petabytes is mind blowing, i remember my first windows pc with 300mb of hdd space.
Education Quotes, along with
more...
to educational quotes that
Education Quotes
more...
Educational Quotes
Best Latin Quotes
more...
Quotable Quotes Booklet on ME
A+Quotes-money
more...
Educational Motivational
quotes for education. very
more...
Education Quotes and Proverbs
Education Quotes and Proverbs
more...
of educational quotes.
bizzle
Apr 3, 10:09 PM
delete
more...
mikemodena
Apr 16, 07:09 PM
google connect360
Awesome.. thanks!!!!
Awesome.. thanks!!!!
Jeremy1026
Apr 4, 11:54 AM
I love all the 'worst carrier ever' comments. Do none of you realize VZW is already charging that much?
more...
gkarris
Mar 25, 10:03 PM
It needs offline maps. Without that, it's pointless on an iPod Touch, or any WiFi-only device. If I could save just one city at a time: say I'm going to London, and I will need a map of London all day, then I could save a given radius of a London map and it would be handy.
What I do now is take screenshots of maps while I still have WiFi, but that's totally annoying to do.
Offline maps would take away income from the Cellular Providers. Also, putting a GPS in the Touch would take away from iPhone sales.
Both won't happen... :eek:
What I do now is take screenshots of maps while I still have WiFi, but that's totally annoying to do.
Offline maps would take away income from the Cellular Providers. Also, putting a GPS in the Touch would take away from iPhone sales.
Both won't happen... :eek:
MattSepeta
Apr 15, 11:00 AM
great reflections! Stitched I assume?
more...
chicagdan
Jan 11, 08:32 AM
I think it's funny that many posts on these boards talk about the excellent value for the Mac Pro (decked out, costing > $4k!), but balk at a $600 phone. This after they've probably dropped $100 on thier existing phone, and $300 on their ipod. For an extra $200, wouldn't you like to have the sexiest phone on the planet.
Well, quite frankly, no. Not when the iPhone tops out at 8 gigs of memory and my current iPod holds 60 gigs and knowing that movies take up more than a gig of memory (why on earth create a device to watch movies that can't hold them?) And considering that all I use a phone for is to make and answer calls ... my RAZR plus iPod is actually a more convenient combination right now.
I say right now because I have zero doubt that Apple will -- 2 or 3 generations down the line -- turn this device into something I have to have. They will increase the flash memory ... they will add features. The killer ap down the line will be speech to text translation, making it possible to avoid the keyboard for everything but light editing. That will change everything and I'm sure Apple's working on it.
But given that reselling an iPhone will be difficult if not impossible, it's almost certainly best to wait and see if prices drop, features improve, battery life gets better, etc. I see no need to be the canary in the coal mine this time. Summer 2008 looks like a much better time to buy version 2.
Well, quite frankly, no. Not when the iPhone tops out at 8 gigs of memory and my current iPod holds 60 gigs and knowing that movies take up more than a gig of memory (why on earth create a device to watch movies that can't hold them?) And considering that all I use a phone for is to make and answer calls ... my RAZR plus iPod is actually a more convenient combination right now.
I say right now because I have zero doubt that Apple will -- 2 or 3 generations down the line -- turn this device into something I have to have. They will increase the flash memory ... they will add features. The killer ap down the line will be speech to text translation, making it possible to avoid the keyboard for everything but light editing. That will change everything and I'm sure Apple's working on it.
But given that reselling an iPhone will be difficult if not impossible, it's almost certainly best to wait and see if prices drop, features improve, battery life gets better, etc. I see no need to be the canary in the coal mine this time. Summer 2008 looks like a much better time to buy version 2.
manu chao
Apr 4, 05:51 PM
nope -- its GIVING users choice. why? remember, w/ iOS subscriptions, YOU get to decide who you opt-in to. you, the CUSTOMER.
And what is the innovation in this? You always had the option to decide (remember those checkboxes). I really don't see how Apple's solution is really different from the current situation.
And what is the innovation in this? You always had the option to decide (remember those checkboxes). I really don't see how Apple's solution is really different from the current situation.
more...
map1978
Jun 17, 10:11 PM
I'm going to Westchester Mall Apple Store because not as hectic as the 3 city stores :D
where you gonna be NY members?
our stores stock should get over 1000 phones easily
where you gonna be NY members?
our stores stock should get over 1000 phones easily
Crystal-RX
Mar 27, 11:41 AM
Just check the ad, there are 4 people bid on this already and the price is $450. They probably believe they get the Iphone.
more...
spacehog371
Mar 25, 05:52 PM
Is this well-veiled sarcasm? If not, you guys are ridiculous.
1) Google does not own the mapping database they use
2) Even if they did, there are multiple geographic/mapping data providers
3) None of them obtained their data by having employees drive around in vehicles... That's an absurd suggestion
Google absolutely owns their own map data. Only in the U.S. for now though.
http://searchengineland.com/no-more-teleatlas-google-goes-it-alone-for-maps-data-27584
The kicker? They obtained that data (or the vast majority of it) with street view cars. Nobody realized street view served a dual purpose: Pictures, but perhaps more importantly, the mapping data.
1) Google does not own the mapping database they use
2) Even if they did, there are multiple geographic/mapping data providers
3) None of them obtained their data by having employees drive around in vehicles... That's an absurd suggestion
Google absolutely owns their own map data. Only in the U.S. for now though.
http://searchengineland.com/no-more-teleatlas-google-goes-it-alone-for-maps-data-27584
The kicker? They obtained that data (or the vast majority of it) with street view cars. Nobody realized street view served a dual purpose: Pictures, but perhaps more importantly, the mapping data.
toughluck
Jul 15, 02:08 PM
This is on one of my physics worksheets! I think the picture speaks for itself.:cool::cool::cool::cool:
more...
r6novak
Nov 19, 04:36 PM
I wrote the email to him - Headers below. It not a fake people...
i removed my email domain so no one emails my work.
From: Steve Jobs <sjobs@apple.com>
Subject: Re: TJ Maxx? Really?
Date: November 19, 2010 11:35:35 AM EST
To: Robert Novak <Robert.Novak@.com>
Received: from ma1ex02..com ([10.10.137.20]) by MA1WP1004..com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:39 -0500
Received: from psmtp.com ([64.18.3.131]) by ma1ex02..com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:38 -0500
Received: from source ([17.254.13.23]) (using TLSv1) by exprod8mx231.postini.com ([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:37 EST
Received: from relay16.apple.com (relay16.apple.com [17.128.113.55]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA824BE7291F for <Robert.Novak@.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:35:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from earhart.apple.com (yeager.apple.com [17.150.10.19]) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 24.35.06455.757A6EC4; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:35:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Auditid: 11807137-b7bf5ae000001937-8b-4ce6a757bc75
In-Reply-To: <7001A0544E30AE498F6FF188E875DBBC0DF4AEAC@MA1WP1004..com>
Message-Id: <179393F0-DC7A-417A-9198-72EC02EEADF7@apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Iz2tfVRC00zRUwOWALJwNw)"
References: <7001A0544E30AE498F6FF188E875DBBC0DF4AEAC@MA1WP1004..com>
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE=
X-Pstn-Levels: (S:99.36494/99.90000 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-Pstn-Settings: 5 (2.0000:0.3000) s cv GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-Pstn-Addresses: from <sjobs@apple.com> [133/9]
Return-Path: sjobs@apple.com
X-Originalarrivaltime: 19 Nov 2010 16:35:39.0191 (UTC) FILETIME=[CCC6A470:01CB8807]
X-Tm-As-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4177-6.500.1024-17778.000
X-Tm-As-Result: No--27.709100-8.000000-31
X-Tm-As-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-Tm-As-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Email...
They are not an authorized reseller.
On Nov 19, at 8:11 AM, Robert Novak wrote:
Steve,
Sai Baba Quotes with pictures
to bring educational based
i removed my email domain so no one emails my work.
From: Steve Jobs <sjobs@apple.com>
Subject: Re: TJ Maxx? Really?
Date: November 19, 2010 11:35:35 AM EST
To: Robert Novak <Robert.Novak@.com>
Received: from ma1ex02..com ([10.10.137.20]) by MA1WP1004..com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:39 -0500
Received: from psmtp.com ([64.18.3.131]) by ma1ex02..com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:38 -0500
Received: from source ([17.254.13.23]) (using TLSv1) by exprod8mx231.postini.com ([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:37 EST
Received: from relay16.apple.com (relay16.apple.com [17.128.113.55]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA824BE7291F for <Robert.Novak@.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:35:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from earhart.apple.com (yeager.apple.com [17.150.10.19]) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 24.35.06455.757A6EC4; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:35:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Auditid: 11807137-b7bf5ae000001937-8b-4ce6a757bc75
In-Reply-To: <7001A0544E30AE498F6FF188E875DBBC0DF4AEAC@MA1WP1004..com>
Message-Id: <179393F0-DC7A-417A-9198-72EC02EEADF7@apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Iz2tfVRC00zRUwOWALJwNw)"
References: <7001A0544E30AE498F6FF188E875DBBC0DF4AEAC@MA1WP1004..com>
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE=
X-Pstn-Levels: (S:99.36494/99.90000 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-Pstn-Settings: 5 (2.0000:0.3000) s cv GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-Pstn-Addresses: from <sjobs@apple.com> [133/9]
Return-Path: sjobs@apple.com
X-Originalarrivaltime: 19 Nov 2010 16:35:39.0191 (UTC) FILETIME=[CCC6A470:01CB8807]
X-Tm-As-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4177-6.500.1024-17778.000
X-Tm-As-Result: No--27.709100-8.000000-31
X-Tm-As-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-Tm-As-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Email...
They are not an authorized reseller.
On Nov 19, at 8:11 AM, Robert Novak wrote:
Steve,
Astro7x
Nov 12, 02:14 PM
I used to use FCP I found it to be overly complicated to do simple tasks. I manly focus on print design so I have not used it for several years.
Recently I have had to make several projects and I found that Premier CS5 was actually a very strong video editing package. It runs smooth, has a clean Adobe interface and everything worked out great.
While I like CS5, I absolutely hate Adobe due to their ultra crappy Indian based tech support. If you buy $10,000 worth of software from a company you don't expect them to charge you $39 just to talk to a person who is getting paid $1 per hour to read a script.
The Adobe interface is certainly nice, but Premiere does so many weird things that I can't stand it for everything it does differently and right (try duplicating a sequence, editing title tool text, and NOT have it be destructive in your older sequences). The interface is so similar to FCP now that it certainly helps ease users into it. Where with Avid I think there is a bit of a learning curve to anyone looking to switch or have to start using that software in a pinch as a freelancer.
While I love the 'no rendering' aspect of using the complete CS package, it is only practical on personal projects. Anything where I am collaborating with clients and additional graphic designers, I can't have them be updating AE comps within my sequence through dynamic link while I'm working on other things in editorial. Just not practical.
Recently I have had to make several projects and I found that Premier CS5 was actually a very strong video editing package. It runs smooth, has a clean Adobe interface and everything worked out great.
While I like CS5, I absolutely hate Adobe due to their ultra crappy Indian based tech support. If you buy $10,000 worth of software from a company you don't expect them to charge you $39 just to talk to a person who is getting paid $1 per hour to read a script.
The Adobe interface is certainly nice, but Premiere does so many weird things that I can't stand it for everything it does differently and right (try duplicating a sequence, editing title tool text, and NOT have it be destructive in your older sequences). The interface is so similar to FCP now that it certainly helps ease users into it. Where with Avid I think there is a bit of a learning curve to anyone looking to switch or have to start using that software in a pinch as a freelancer.
While I love the 'no rendering' aspect of using the complete CS package, it is only practical on personal projects. Anything where I am collaborating with clients and additional graphic designers, I can't have them be updating AE comps within my sequence through dynamic link while I'm working on other things in editorial. Just not practical.
nizmoz
Dec 28, 09:00 AM
The IT department won't want macs, it will put people like me out of a job.
I see a lot of BS in this thread and a lot of people pretending to be IT who aren't. As far as someone saying windows server 2008 is rock solid...I completely disagree.
And whoever thinks Dell has great enterprise support I absolutely 100% disagree. Their support is freaking terrible and I love how they try and claim that they can't cover servers under warranty if the server is at an APO address. Dell is too stupid to realize any APO address, regardless of where it is at in the world is U.S. soil. /rant
Anyway OP, windows generally dominates the enterprise world but it doesn't mean macs can't be used.
While I haven't liked Dell enterprise support, they have been good for what we need. We have 7 Dell Poweredge servers and NONE of them have had problems since we have had them. Some as old as 4 years old.
Windows 2008 Server has been pretty stable for us with less issues vs Windows 2003. I would say it's a very stable O/S. As we rarely have to restart the boxes for issues, it's usually just for updates.
Now where I hate Microsoft is in Exchange 2010. Exchange everything was built into AD so you could add users in the same AD area and it would add them to Exchange from there. Now with 2007 and it is separate. You have to add the user in AD, then you must open your Exchange Manager, and add the user to a mailbox there. Or go through Exchange to add the user in that program which will add him to AD but without the security rights of a user if you wish to copy that person.
I see a lot of BS in this thread and a lot of people pretending to be IT who aren't. As far as someone saying windows server 2008 is rock solid...I completely disagree.
And whoever thinks Dell has great enterprise support I absolutely 100% disagree. Their support is freaking terrible and I love how they try and claim that they can't cover servers under warranty if the server is at an APO address. Dell is too stupid to realize any APO address, regardless of where it is at in the world is U.S. soil. /rant
Anyway OP, windows generally dominates the enterprise world but it doesn't mean macs can't be used.
While I haven't liked Dell enterprise support, they have been good for what we need. We have 7 Dell Poweredge servers and NONE of them have had problems since we have had them. Some as old as 4 years old.
Windows 2008 Server has been pretty stable for us with less issues vs Windows 2003. I would say it's a very stable O/S. As we rarely have to restart the boxes for issues, it's usually just for updates.
Now where I hate Microsoft is in Exchange 2010. Exchange everything was built into AD so you could add users in the same AD area and it would add them to Exchange from there. Now with 2007 and it is separate. You have to add the user in AD, then you must open your Exchange Manager, and add the user to a mailbox there. Or go through Exchange to add the user in that program which will add him to AD but without the security rights of a user if you wish to copy that person.
AppliedVisual
Nov 2, 12:55 PM
As expected, FedEx delivered my shuffle this morning. I set mine up and noticed Apple already had a firmware update for it. Anyway, I loaded it with music and have been playing with it off and on for the past couple hours. Pretty cool little unit. I wish the spring on the clip was stronger so it would clip/bite harder, but it's not bad. I'll take it to the gym this afternoon and see how well it works.
The pictures don't do it justice. The thing is really smaller than you think it is, even looking at the pictures. So far I'm rather pleased.
The pictures don't do it justice. The thing is really smaller than you think it is, even looking at the pictures. So far I'm rather pleased.
sandkicks
Apr 26, 01:51 AM
yes to both. I will post post a pic now.
http://file:///Users/Sandkicks/Pictures/iPhoto%20Library/Masters/2011/04/25/20110425-235115/IMG_0353.JPG
http://file:///Users/Sandkicks/Pictures/iPhoto%20Library/Masters/2011/04/25/20110425-235115/IMG_0353.JPG
cmaier
Apr 4, 04:12 PM
On a side note, I wonder whether Apple violates competition rules. When I remember correctly, the iPad had a considerable market share on the tablet market. One could argue that Apple abuses its market position to impose their own (unfair) conditions on publishers.
They don't compete with publishers, and the "tablet market" is not probably too narrow a definition of a "market" (more likely, anti-trust authorities would be interested in the overall "pc" market or the "mobile" market.)
They don't compete with publishers, and the "tablet market" is not probably too narrow a definition of a "market" (more likely, anti-trust authorities would be interested in the overall "pc" market or the "mobile" market.)
Aduntu
Apr 24, 01:32 AM
Either way, linking some overused passage lends absolutely nothing to this discussion or any like it. So what's the point of reviving the thread with it? All it does is show that this person can't speak for himself (or herself).
I do not disagree.
I do not disagree.
scott.n
Apr 15, 08:14 PM
I've been keeping an eye on the refurbished displays section of the Apple Store and was surprised to see the 2nd item in the attached screenshot this evening.
I wonder where Apple found these. This is model M9179LL/A, discontinued in 2006 according to Mactracker.
I wonder where Apple found these. This is model M9179LL/A, discontinued in 2006 according to Mactracker.
No comments:
Post a Comment